3. Functional orthoses (metatarsal and arch support)
A recent randomised clinical trial by de Oliveira et al. (13) investigated the effectiveness of customised foot orthoses with metatarsal and arch support compared to flat insoles for relieving symptoms in Morton’s neuroma. They found that patients using foot orthoses had reduced pain when walking compared to the control group (flat insoles).
When used as part of a treatment plan, the FRANKIE4 Support Footbeds are much like a soft pre-fabricated (off the shelf) support insole, a great base for podiatrists and physiotherapists or other skilled people to customise (if needed). Our Support footbeds have soft contoured support that our customers report to be very comfortable according to verified buyer reviews. Supportive additions such as metatarsal dome padding can be added in the forefoot area in a position specific to wearers needs.
4. Pain medications (e.g. anti-inflammatories)
- Cortisone injections
- Serial local anaesthetic injections
- Sclerosing agents
- Extra Corporeal Shock wave therapy
Surgery
Studies indicate a range of satisfaction outcomes after surgical management ranging from 60% to 96% in uncontrolled trials (11, 18, 19). It is worth asking the question why some patients are NOT happy after having a neurectomy.
If we look at little deeper into some studies, such as the one by Lee et al. (18), which is a 10-year follow up of neurectomy, we identify why patient outcomes may not be as good as they could be. Although the visual analogue scale improved in all patients and 61% reported good satisfaction, there was a great deal of ‘numbness’ of the toes reported by 11 out of the 13 patients and this appeared to affect the satisfaction results.
We as surgeons expect the interdigital area to be NUMB, because we are removing a nerve whose role is to provide sensation/feeling. This needs to be communicated to the patient as something to expect. This is an important consideration that needs to be discussed prior to surgery to prepare the patient and make them aware that altered sensation in the webspace can be a consequence of removing the nerve. As I see it, it’s not a complication as such, because we know we are removing a structure that allows you to feel sensation and a consequence is altered sensation/numbness.
Again, I want to focus on the relatively poor outcome of another paper, this one by Kasparek and Schneider (20), which helps in improving our understanding of surgical outcomes. In this retrospective review, although just short of 80% reported good to excellent outcomes after surgery, 12% and 8.2% reported fair and poor results respectively, such that patients reported similar pain after their surgery compared to before their surgery.
Of course there is going to be some variation, but my concern is that a poor outcome from surgical intervention may indicate the nerve trunk has not been fully removed. By removing the pathological nerve as proximal as possible, away from the metatarsal heads, the residual end of the nerve stump is not going to get incarcerated in the scar tissue.
I feel that inadequate resection (that is, the nerve truck is not cut away proximal enough) may be what is responsible for the poor outcome reported in this paper, and the high rate of second or revision surgery to remove what should have been removed in the first place. This is also supported by the histopathology reports after the second revisional surgery that indicated it was a neuroma. So, the neuroma in fact had not been removed in its entirety.
Does size matter?
Yes. You do need to consider size. A large neuroma is not likely to respond to non-operative treatment. Reducing intermetatarsal compressive/shear loads with an orthosis is not going to be enough with a large lesion. Mobilization or massage is not going to cut it. Even with sclerosing agents and cortisone, there is a lot of shrinking to be done to get a desirable effect with a large, thick, dense, fibrotic lesion. Size is important. Ask the radiologist to provide a measurement when ordering your ultrasound. Correlate this knowledge of size with the physical exam and degree of symptomology and see if it all make sense.
However, don’t underestimate the pain derived from small lesions. Don’t forget that pain is subjective. Small lesions are equally able to cause pain as much as larger lesions. So while a large lesion is not necessarily more painful than a small one, I feel that a large lesion is more recalcitrant to non-operative treatment than a smaller one.
Pain reported by the patient, the history and results of physical examination, irrespective of whether ultrasound shows pathology or not is still meaningful. The absence of frank pathology is meaningful. It’s likely to be something else such as a ‘neuritis’ or bursitis or adhesive capsulitis. If that’s the case you still need to intervene depending on the impact on quality of life and overall daily pain, because we treat human beings, not scans.
Consider the non-operative treatment I have discussed, as in my view, these non-operative treatments are going to be effective with small or no lesions. Small or no pathology is GOOD so communicate this to the patient because size does matter. You may be having another discussion with your patient if there was a 12mm lesion on musculoskeletal ultrasound, about prognosis with non-operative treatment and the need for further possible surgical intervention because of the size.
Redd et al. (21) showed using ultrasound that neuromas can be present but not necessarily painful, and that neuromas >5mm are more likely to cause symptoms. So 5mm is the number to keep in mind, and the number that makes a neuroma a neuroma.